The title of this article says: Court dismisses pledge suit.
Just reading that title you might think the Supreme court said something about whether the words “under God” should be in the pledge of allegiance. They, in fact, did not. They said the plantiff was not the legal guardian of the little girl he was suing for and therefore the case was tossed out on a technicality.
I hate misleading articles. The title shouldve been: Supreme court finds technicality to avoid decision on Pledge suit.