<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The UX of Chrome 3.0.192.1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-chrome-3-0-192-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-chrome-3-0-192-1/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-ux-of-chrome-3-0-192-1</link>
	<description>UX = User Experience by Glen Lipka</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdmadph</title>
		<link>http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-chrome-3-0-192-1/#comment-10841</link>
		<dc:creator>mdmadph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commadot.com/?p=1493#comment-10841</guid>
		<description>Oh, I agree with you.  As much as we all love Chrome, you can thank Google for the changing meaning of &quot;Beta.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I agree with you.  As much as we all love Chrome, you can thank Google for the changing meaning of &#8220;Beta.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Lipka</title>
		<link>http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-chrome-3-0-192-1/#comment-10839</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Lipka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commadot.com/?p=1493#comment-10839</guid>
		<description>So now &quot;Unstable Dev&quot; is the new &quot;beta&quot;.  Maybe they should call it Alpha.  Still, it works perfectly.  What is unstable about it?  Firebug has the right model.  You install a version 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 and it checks for updates for that version.  They should be testing upgrades as well as other browser functions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So now &#8220;Unstable Dev&#8221; is the new &#8220;beta&#8221;.  Maybe they should call it Alpha.  Still, it works perfectly.  What is unstable about it?  Firebug has the right model.  You install a version 1.4, 1.5, 1.6 and it checks for updates for that version.  They should be testing upgrades as well as other browser functions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mdmadph</title>
		<link>http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-chrome-3-0-192-1/#comment-10838</link>
		<dc:creator>mdmadph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:24:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commadot.com/?p=1493#comment-10838</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not 3.0 that&#039;s in beta -- it&#039;s still in unstable dev.  You&#039;re not even supposed to use it. :P  Only way to get it is to either install it directly or change your Google distribution channel to the dev channel, otherwise Chrome won&#039;t notify you of it:  http://www.electrictoolbox.com/google-chrome-switch-to-dev-channel/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not 3.0 that&#8217;s in beta &#8212; it&#8217;s still in unstable dev.  You&#8217;re not even supposed to use it. <img src='http://commadot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />   Only way to get it is to either install it directly or change your Google distribution channel to the dev channel, otherwise Chrome won&#8217;t notify you of it:  <a href="http://www.electrictoolbox.com/google-chrome-switch-to-dev-channel/" >http://www.electrictoolbox.com/google-chrome-switch-to-dev-channel/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

