<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The UX of the iPad</title>
	<atom:link href="http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-the-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-the-ipad/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-ux-of-the-ipad</link>
	<description>UX = User Experience by Glen Lipka</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 May 2012 20:25:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta4-20738</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-the-ipad/#comment-13780</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 20:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commadot.com/?p=1936#comment-13780</guid>
		<description>I do not tweet.  I write...therefore I am?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do not tweet.  I write&#8230;therefore I am?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Lipka</title>
		<link>http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-the-ipad/#comment-13773</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Lipka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 15:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commadot.com/?p=1936#comment-13773</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I may have to put a character limit on comments. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I may have to put a character limit on comments. <img src='http://commadot.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://commadot.com/the-ux-of-the-ipad/#comment-13772</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 14:46:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://commadot.com/?p=1936#comment-13772</guid>
		<description>I think the iPad will  be very popular and fits into Apple&#039;s larger picture.  The main purpose of the iPad was to do as much as possible, without competing against other apple products.  It is not a computer (mac) or a phone (iphone) or a small mp3 players (ipod).  Apple wants people to own many apple products and not just one super product.  The one concern is that is someone comes out with a super-product, it might make all of Apple&#039;s product&#039;s obsolete at one.  I&#039;m not sure why no one is working on this.  Here is the product I want.

The size of an iPad, with the same touchpad and also with a small pull out keyboard (or even a keyboard you can easily plug into the button the device).  It runs windows 7 or the Mac 0S.  It has a iPone/Mp3/GPS Player built directly into it, but it is removable.  So I can take the whole thing, or just the part I need.  I want a good battery and a retractable cord that I can plug in wherever I go.  I want it to have a &quot;book reader&#039; mode, which changes the screen graphics so it can be a kindle.  I want internet access.  I want it to run apps and programs (the portable iPhone/Mp3 can run just Apps).  A camera built in is nice.  All of this seems somewhat reasonable.  I think Apple could have done with already, but didn&#039;t want to compete with itself.  

Anyway, I am not getting an iPad. I have my phone for calls, mp3s, and crappy internet.  I have my laptop for train rides and business.  I have a GPS in my car.  I don&#039;t want to carry something big around unless I can replace several other things.  But I am old and poor.  I think the IPad will sell well and it will especially  hurt Kindle sales.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the iPad will  be very popular and fits into Apple&#8217;s larger picture.  The main purpose of the iPad was to do as much as possible, without competing against other apple products.  It is not a computer (mac) or a phone (iphone) or a small mp3 players (ipod).  Apple wants people to own many apple products and not just one super product.  The one concern is that is someone comes out with a super-product, it might make all of Apple&#8217;s product&#8217;s obsolete at one.  I&#8217;m not sure why no one is working on this.  Here is the product I want.</p>
<p>The size of an iPad, with the same touchpad and also with a small pull out keyboard (or even a keyboard you can easily plug into the button the device).  It runs windows 7 or the Mac 0S.  It has a iPone/Mp3/GPS Player built directly into it, but it is removable.  So I can take the whole thing, or just the part I need.  I want a good battery and a retractable cord that I can plug in wherever I go.  I want it to have a &#8220;book reader&#8217; mode, which changes the screen graphics so it can be a kindle.  I want internet access.  I want it to run apps and programs (the portable iPhone/Mp3 can run just Apps).  A camera built in is nice.  All of this seems somewhat reasonable.  I think Apple could have done with already, but didn&#8217;t want to compete with itself.  </p>
<p>Anyway, I am not getting an iPad. I have my phone for calls, mp3s, and crappy internet.  I have my laptop for train rides and business.  I have a GPS in my car.  I don&#8217;t want to carry something big around unless I can replace several other things.  But I am old and poor.  I think the IPad will sell well and it will especially  hurt Kindle sales.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

