Comments on: UX Rule Number 1 http://commadot.com/ux-rule-number-1/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=ux-rule-number-1 UX = User Experience by Glen Lipka Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:42:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: tony http://commadot.com/ux-rule-number-1/#comment-15957 tony Sun, 19 Dec 2010 16:00:35 +0000 http://commadot.com/?p=1983#comment-15957 as a rule of thumb perhaps but...the rule itself as stated is rather superficial, i.e. you might come up with a breakthrough idea while not necessarily understand yourself why at first... ..innovation? as a rule of thumb perhaps but…the rule itself as stated is rather superficial,
i.e. you might come up with a breakthrough idea while not necessarily understand yourself why at first…
..innovation?

]]> By: Matthew McEachen http://commadot.com/ux-rule-number-1/#comment-13911 Matthew McEachen Sat, 06 Mar 2010 07:08:02 +0000 http://commadot.com/?p=1983#comment-13911 YES! This applies just as much to engineering as it does to UX -- without really grokking the feature's value, you're leaving success to serendipity. And serendipity is a harsh mistress. From what I hear, at least. YES!

This applies just as much to engineering as it does to UX — without really grokking the feature’s value, you’re leaving success to serendipity. And serendipity is a harsh mistress. From what I hear, at least.

]]>